Publication Date: 14th February 2012
Pages: 272
Book Source: Houghten Mifflin Harcourt & NetGalley
Synopsis: Rachel Lockyer is under
investigation for murder.
It is 1649. King Charles has been beheaded for
treason. Amid civil war, Cromwell's army is running the country. The Levellers,
a small faction of political agitators, are calling for rights to the people.
And a new law targeting unwed mothers and “lewd women” presumes anyone who
conceals the death of her illegitimate child is guilty of murder.
Rachel Lockyer, unmarried glove maker, and
William Walwyn, Leveller hero, are locked in a secret affair. But while William
is imprisoned in the Tower, a child is found buried in the woods and Rachel is
arrested.
So comes an investigation, public trial, and a
cast of extraordinary characters made up of ordinary Londoners: gouty
investigator Thomas Bartwain, fiery Elizabeth Lilburne and her
revolution-chasing husband, Huguenot glover Mary Du Gard, a lawyer for the
prosecution hell-bent on making an example of Rachel, and others. Spinning
within are Rachel and William, their remarkable love story, and the miracles
that come to even the commonest lives.
My Thoughts:
I enjoyed the historical backdrop to
Accidents of Providence, 17th century Commonwealth England under the
strict control of Puritan Oliver Cromwell following the execution of
Charles I. There was much detail regarding the political and religious unrest
of the time, the role of political agitators, the Levellers, and the shocking
social plight of women, The story evolves from the draconian 1624
"Act to Prevent the Destroying and Murdering of Bastard Children."
After an extended, passionate affair glovemaker
Rachel Lockyer finds herself pregnant to lover William Walwyn, married father
of 14. A tragedy ensues and criminal investigator Thomas Bartwain is
brought in. What follows is an in-depth look at the investigative
process, Rachel's arrest and trial for the murder of her baby. Under the
act, anyone concealing the death of an illegitimate child is charged with
murder unless there's a witness that the child was born dead.
The author excels with her descriptions of
London, the squalor, the stench, the inhumane conditions of Newgate prison;
covered in such graphic, vivid detail to make your skin crawl. I pity those
unfortunate enough to end up in that god-forsaken place as it was beyond
appalling experiencing it through the safety of the book's pages.
What didn't work: I didn't connect with the characters. It
was difficult to feel empathy for Rachel until she was inprisoned but even then
my empathy was really for anyone suffering under such atrocious conditions
rather than Rachel herself. Walywn came across as a spineless ass; end of story.
I found it more than irritating that Rachel made
no attempt to defend herself or for that matter speak. at all. It wasn't clear
until the last whether Rachel had little memory of events, whether she was
guilty and felt she deserved her fate or if there was something else at work.
With such tragic circumstances there was so much
potential for emotional investment but sadly I just didn't care about the
characters.
Whilst the ending first seemed implausible it was
interesting to learn that it was actually inspired by true events and I did
enjoy the author's notes regarding historical figures and literary licence.
Overall a bleak but honest reflection of this historical period.
This was just an ok read for me as well. I did not connect or like any of the characters in the book but the history in it was interesting.
ReplyDeleteI do not know, for the first thing I would just get so mad at some of those people
ReplyDeleteI requested this when it first came available but I haven't read it yet. The setting seemed interesting but I haven't yet read many rave reviews about it.
ReplyDeleteIt is always interesting when you think that the ending of a book seems improbable but then you find out that it was actually based on real life events!
Bummer!!! This sounds like it would have been a great book! Thanks for your honest review!!
ReplyDeleteI have this one to read on my Kindle and I have to say that the cover looks better than what I will be reading inside!!
ReplyDeleteI absolutely adore historical fiction, so even though it wasn't the best ever, I might still read it!
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I got my Anne Merrick Prize pack today!
Thank you so much, it is AWESOME!
I was so thrilled to have won this giveaway!
http://juliababyjenreadingroom.blogspot.com/2012/03/in-my-mailbox-4.html
There is nothing more I hate then not being able to connect with the main characters. It is the main reason I stopped reading the Sookie Stackhouse series. I just didn't like her or cared what happened to her and the first vamp boyf annoyed me even more. Anyway I might pass on this one unless another "trusted" book blogger gives a different review to sway me in the other direction :) A fair review by the way and it is a shame it didn't connect for you as it had the potential for an interesting and emotional read.
ReplyDelete